Are you grappling with the issue of an unmanageable expansion of Microsoft Teams within your organization? Have you ever paused to consider the cost implications of Microsoft Teams sprawl? The unchecked growth and redundancy of Teams channels can lead to many consequences, including increased confusion, jeopardized security, lowered productivity, and compromised efficiency.
The rise of Microsoft Teams is closely intertwined with the evolution and expansion of modern enterprises. This tool offers a promising solution to facilitate seamless collaboration among employees when harnessed properly, but this requires continuous governance and insightful strategies for optimal utilization. A lack of a comprehensive governance plan during deployment might result in an overly intricate environment that can overwhelm users.
For instance, new employees must be integrated into appropriate Teams for their specific departments and projects when they join the fold. Instead of folding new members into existing Teams, a common pitfall for organizations is creating new channels. This, at times unintentional, duplication or even triplication of existing channels contributes to the phenomenon known as “Teams sprawl” – a perplexing proliferation of redundant, deserted, or leaderless Teams.
The repercussions of Teams sprawl are multi-faceted, ranging from confusion and squandered resources to security threats and non-compliance risks. This sprawl can also impair productivity and inflate costs, thus translating into revenue loss. Without rigorous governance, structured organization, and enhanced user training, the valuable potential of Microsoft Teams can go unutilized, leading to a loss of time and resources.
The detrimental effects of Microsoft Teams overlap are far-reaching, jeopardizing company investments and going beyond just financial implications. The most profound cost is arguably not fiscal; it’s the frustration and confusion sowed among Teams users by the sprawl. This confusion typically arises when users struggle to find a Team they believed to be in existence or grapple with navigating the interface, often resorting to creating a fresh team.
Consider a scenario where an organization of 1,000 team members generates roughly 50 Teams monthly. This amounts to almost an entire working week (37.5 hours) spent creating Teams each month. This alarming figure underscores the magnitude of the drain on internal IT staff tasked with delivering actionable insights to the executive team about the ideal strategy to arrange Microsoft Teams and curtail the sprawl. Among their responsibilities are conducting regular audits encompassing:
Maintaining order in the Teams environment also demands ongoing clean-up tasks, like merging duplicate Teams, archiving and deleting workspaces, and general upkeep.
A chaotic Teams environment can also serve as a gateway for Shadow IT, the unsanctioned cloud software that might replace Teams. The rise in remote work has exacerbated this risk. A startling statistic reveals that 46% of IT leaders perceive using unauthorized software as a surefire way to render an organization’s data protection efforts futile. As cybercriminals evolve their strategies to exploit configuration errors and undetected vulnerabilities in unsanctioned applications, targeted attacks are increasing. Alarmingly, 45% of breaches occur in the cloud.
When multiple teams concentrate on identical topics or events, identifying the authentic source is often challenging. For instance, if salespeople receive multiple Teams updates, which one should they trust as the most recent or reliable? Miscommunication of this kind can lead to misunderstandings and errors. Multiple Teams dedicated to the same topic can breed confusion and frustration, eventually undermining team morale.
Incorporating Teams into the organization’s workflow requires training all employees. It necessitates the IT department’s creation of manuals, videos, or real-time sessions to ensure everyone is on the same page. This exercise can prove time-consuming and expensive, especially for large organizations.
Post-implementation, the IT staff is bound to be flooded with queries and requests regarding using Teams. It teams are estimated to devote between three to five hours weekly to respond to software-specific queries, which is approximately 200 hours annually.
Companies must tackle the Microsoft Teams sprawl head-on to ensure user-friendliness and alleviate the additional burden on internal resources. Microsoft’s advanced templates are a potential solution, offering a pre-configured framework to foster consistency and structure within various business operations. However, the manual customization of these templates to cater to complex business requirements can be daunting and could consume internal resources that companies might lack.
Companies like us offer assistance in assessing and revising your current policies and procedures to combat Microsoft Teams sprawl and optimize your Teams environment. Our team of experts provides regular assessments and ongoing support to guarantee adoption, utilization, compliance, and security.
Organizing and optimizing your Teams environment doesn’t have to be a challenge. Here’s how we can assist:
In conclusion, the unchecked sprawl of Microsoft Teams channels can have significant cost implications for businesses. The impact can be far-reaching, from wasted resources and decreased productivity to security risks and compliance issues. Organizations must recognize and address this issue, leveraging tools and external support to optimize their Teams environment, thus enhancing productivity and operational efficiency.